Musing Out Loud

Random postings from Anne Mai Bertelsen 

Work+Family:Economic Productivity, Not Balance

Last Thursday, I had the privilege of chatting online with a dozen plus women (and one working dad) about the challenges of balancing work and family.  The conversation, moderated by Joanne Bamberger aka PunditMom and organized by Fem2pt0, is part of a larger initiative by Fem2pt0 to move the public policy dial by re-framing this important issue. 

It was a great chat -- you can read the archived chat here -- but when it was over, I felt unfulfilled.  Not because of what anyone said -- in fact, there were many great comments and observations raised -- but rather for what was not said, including by me.  So much of the conversation focused on balancing the competing demands of work and family; a conversation that has dogged my 19 years of motherhood.  But, perhaps what working families need is not balance but rather unfettered ability to be productive.  

Let me explain:  balance suggests a state of equilibrium, of two equal parts. But, when we use the word "balance" -- as in work+family balance, it sends shivers down many legislators and corporate executives.  It suggests to them "hand outs" -- in the form of liberal paid time off, job protection during prolonged absences, etc. -- that all serve (in their minds) to reduce productivity and increase costs.  It becomes such a lightening rod, not because the legislators or corporate executives are penny pinching heartless slave drivers (although I'm sure there are some) but rather because productivity is a distinctly American trait: it is hard wired in our DNA (remember the Puritan Work Ethic?). Policies that detract from productivity are anti-American and -- forgive the pun -- counter-productive. 

Yet, removing the barriers that prevent us from being productive is good for business and benefits not only the employer but our government as well.  In fact, evidence suggests that family-friendly policies are anything but unproductive.  

States with family-friendly policies have documented financial benefits to employers such as:

  • A detailed analysis in Massachusetts of the costs of paid sick leave vs reduced employee turnover found a net savings to employers of $.89 per employee 
  • Several California studies found significant employer savings through paid family and sick leave programs
Furthermore, an exhaustive cross-country examination found increased economic competitiveness and lower unemployment in the 14 countries with progressive family-friendly policies.  Sadly, the U.S. was not one of them. 

All of this suggests that family-friendly policies enhance productivity and are good for the bottom line -- for both companies and our country's economic well being.  Perhaps its time we adopt the language of economics and talk about productivity and GDP contributions vs. balance and equity.

 

 

Filed under  //   motherhood   work+family balance   work+life balance  

Comments [0]

Rejection, Acceptance, Re-invention - By Way Of Adoption

I originally wrote this piece in February, 2009, in response to a New York Times article but I couldn't bring myself to hit the "publish" button.  A new study is being released today looking at the long term effects of transracial adoption prompted me to hit the "publish" button.  

 

Photo: Prospective children for adoption sent to potential adoptive parents. I'm on the right. Seoul, Korea.

I'm adopted.  It's something I got used to stating with no real emotion; a fact I would rattle off like "I'm Korean.  I'm one of seven kids."  But, this sunday, reading "Saying Yes to Ryan" in the New York Times Magazine, I was suddenly caught by a flood of memories: of the orphanage, of the chaotic tumble of handicapped children clawing to the dining hall, of my utter confusion in the early days and the fervent desire to return to that orphanage.

While the author mused on the discovery that she and her husband were able to "say yes" to Ryan only because another family  passed him over, adopted children are never given that luxury.  We have the mirror experience.  We don't choose; we are chosen or passed over.  That lack of control over our destiny permeates our psyche -- or at least, it did mine.   I understood, from the moment of my placement, that my "new" family could send me back to Korea;  I could not reject them and return.

But, crying to return to Korea was what I did for the first year of life here in America.  At six, fluent only in Korean, I was incapable of articulating my feelings of despair and disappointment.

As an adolescent grappling with my identity, the well intended euphemisms of altruism (on my biological parents' side) and choice (on my adoptive parents' side) did nothing to lessen the loss I still felt.  The facts were clear:  somewhere before I turned two, someone decided -- maybe with the best intentions -- that they didn't want me anymore; that I was too much to deal with.  They gave me up or they gave up on me.   It didn't matter which; the effect was the same:  I was abandoned.

Like the stages of grief outlined by Elisabeth Kubler-Ross, I went through my own stages of anger, denial and ultimately, acceptance.

Although it took maturity -- and motherhood -- for me to reach acceptance.  And, I learned something along the way.  Euphemisms don't help an adoptive child overcome that initial, latent sense of rejection.  All of us  encounter rejection routinely in our lives:  the party we weren't invited to, the friendship that wasn't return, the job that wasn't offered.  Aiding an adopted child to accept that initial rejection can help us move past it.  I'm not saying that adoptive parents should blurt out "someone didn't want you."  But, if your child asks, answer them honestly.  It's what I try to do for my own children -- even to questions that make me squirm.

When I finally accepted the fact that someone gave me up,  I felt liberated.  I realized my life essentially got a re-boot.  And, that re-boot allowed me to re-invent myself combining what was hard-wired in my DNA and acquired through my adoptive family.

 

Filed under  //   Adoption  

Comments [1]

Pane Integrale (Whole-Wheat Bread)

I love making bread -- and this recipe is sooooo simple: 5 minutes to mix up. You just need time to work to leaven the dough. I start mine the night before and leave it out on the counter, covered with a tea towel. While the recipe says to leave it for 12-18 hours, I have been known to leave it for 24. It doesn't seem to bother it one iota.

The only modification I made was to reduce the salt to 1/2 tsp; it was too salty otherwise.

The bread will be beautifully chewy inside with a lovely crust.


 

Adapted from “My Bread,” by Jim Lahey.

 

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

 

Related

Field Report: Grain Elevator (October 11, 2009)

2 1/4 cups (300 grams) bread flour

3/4 cup (100 grams) wheat flour

1 1/2 teaspoons (8 grams) table salt

1/2 teaspoon (2 grams) instant or dry active yeast

1 1/4 cups (300 grams) cool water (55 to 65 degrees)

Wheat bran, cornmeal or flour, for dusting.

1. In a medium bowl, stir together the flours, salt and yeast. Add the water, and using a wooden spoon or your hands, mix until you have a wet, sticky dough, about 30 seconds. Cover the bowl with a towel or plastic wrap and let sit at room temperature until the surface is dotted with bubbles and the dough is more than doubled in size, 12 to 18 hours.

2. When the first rise is complete, generously dust a work surface with flour. Use a bowl scraper or rubber spatula to gently scrape the dough out of the bowl in one piece. Using lightly floured hands or a bowl scraper or spatula, lift the edges of the dough in toward the center. Nudge and tuck in the edges of the dough to make it round.

3. Place a cotton or linen tea towel on your work surface and very generously sprinkle it with wheat bran, cornmeal or flour, using at least ⅓ cup. Gently place the dough on the towel, seam-side down. If the dough is tacky, dust the top lightly with wheat bran, cornmeal or flour. Fold the ends of the tea towel loosely over the dough to cover and place it in a warm, draft-free spot to rise for 1 to 2 hours. The dough is ready when it is almost doubled. If you gently poke it with your finger, it should hold the impression. If it springs back, let it rise for another 15 minutes.

4. Thirty minutes before the end of the second rise, preheat the oven to 475 degrees, with a rack positioned in the lower third, and place a covered 4½-to-5½-quart heavy pot in the center of the rack. If using a lid with a plastic handle, be sure that it can tolerate high temperatures. You might have to unscrew it and plug the hole with aluminum foil.

5. Using thick potholders, carefully remove the preheated pot from the oven and uncover it. Unfold the tea towel and quickly but gently invert the dough into the pot, seam-side up. (Use caution: the pot will be very hot.) Cover the pot and bake for 30 minutes.

6. Remove the lid and continue baking until the bread is a deep chestnut color but not burned, 15 to 30 minutes more. Use a heatproof spatula or potholders to carefully lift the bread out of the pot and place on a rack to cool thoroughly.

Makes one 10-inch-round loaf.

 

Filed under  //   Recipes  

Comments [0]

Piano Stairs

I love this video. It reminds me of a time in the 1980s when the celebrated Guardian Angels, founded by Curtis Sliwa, "protected" the subways of New York. It was late in the day and I was coming out of the E train at 53rd and 5th. If you've ever taken that train, from the South, you know that that particular stop has a VERY LONG flight of stairs to the street.

On that day, I was riding the escalator up from the sub terrain depths of the E stop to 53rd street, like most of the other commuters. In the center staircase, several female Guardian Angels -- dressed in their white T shirts and red berets -- were tap dancing up the stairs. Up and down, tapping out a wonderful melody. And, I, in corporate uniform with the requisite briefcase, rode leaden up that long, hot escalator, closing my eyes and listening to that wonderful tap, tap, tap as they hit their heels up once, down twice. One day, I want to do that: run up those endless stairs, tapping out a melody in my head.

Comments [0]

Fall Harvest: Tomato Tart and Stir Fry

 

With the waning of the days, the garden is slowing down it's production.  We still have some tomatoes, zucchini, chard and now winter squash.  At this time of year, too, the tomatoes are a little "drier" -- so they are perfect in a tart.  

This is made really simple to make using purchased puff pastry (although you can make it too):  roll out puff pastry on parchment paper to desired size, puncture with a fork randomly throughout (minimizes the puffing), and bake on a cookie tray for about 15 minutes in 400 degree oven til lightly brown.  Then, add thinly sliced tomatoes on top of the baked pastry, sprinkle fresh herbs (I used marjoram here), cheese (I used up the ends of various cheeses -- cheddar, mozzarella, romano) and baked for another 15 minutes, til the cheese has melted. Yummy!  

We had some left over beef from last night's carne asada (recipe courtesy of cafe pasqual's in New Mexico) to which I slivered the beef and added sauteed chard, matchstick zucchini, roasted onions, green pepper and ramen noodles.  There was not a morsel left over.

 

 

Comments [0]

Giving Back: My Father's Legacy

 

When I was growing up in the 60s and 70s -- yes, I'm that old -- my dad, an architect by training, spent a lot of time attending chicken dinners at the Elks, Lion's, Rotary and Kiwanis clubs as well as at places of worship.  He went to those dinners not as a politician or a member but as a representative of the Committee of 1000, a small group organized to help care for and find homes for Vietnamese orphans.  I don't know much about the Committee of 1000 -- who started it, its mission, its membership.  I just know my dad was out a lot speaking to these civic and church groups, leaving my mom home with us seven children, ranging in age from 18 to four years old.  I also remember a periodic newsletter that he and my mom put out on the progress of the Committee of 1000.  My younger brother John and I were the "in-house" mail-house for those newsletters.  We would sort them into states, then counties and then zipcodes so that the newsletters could go out under a non-profit bulk rate.  This was my first introduction to direct marketing.

As I got older and became involved in politics and social change, I often thought about my father's commitment for social good.  He was not doing this out of a sense of noblesse oblige; our family would never have been mistaken for being well off.  But, rather, from a deeply religious sense of giving back.  His own up bringing had been difficult: he was technically an orphan, having lost both his biological parents by the time he was ten.

I wanted to capture his story for my family and for complete strangers.  I want others to know that it doesn't take a lot of money or fame to make a difference.  So, a few months ago, I signed up to participate in StoryCorps' Memory Loss initiative. 

Last weekend, I set off for my dad's house to record him.  My father is 77 now and suffers from Parkinson's, a degenerative disease that impairs his muscular functioning.  The hands that were capable of drawing perfectly straight lines free form, shake and tremor unpredictably.  He uses a walker but most importantly his memory, his speech and his cognitive functioning are declining.  I recorded him for about 70 minutes over a five hour period.  We had to stop often because he got tired or frustrated or bored.

We had a good talk but in the end, I'm not sure there is enough usable material for the lovely team at StoryCorps to cobble together a story.  There has just been too much time, memory loss and cognitive degeneration to capture the details:  the why, the how, the who that form the foundation of his story.

Disappointed at myself for not having pulled this together sooner, I randomly googled all possible permutations to see if the Internet could unlock some clues.  I had tried this over the years but always ended up empty handed.  And, then, an hour before Fed Ex came to pick up the recorder and return it to StoryCorps, I found this article from the New York Times, appended to a grant request, which I have excerpted below:  

Efforts Grow to Bring Here Babies That GI's Left in Vietnam by Winthrop A. Rockwell, New York Times, January 3, 1972

"... In New Jersey, a group called the Council on Adoptable Children, International, has recently become active in organizing to bring Vietnamese orphans to the United States.  Roy Bertleson [sic], one of the prime movers of the group, says it is working with Welcome House and Lutheran Social Services of Minnesota to explore the possibility of setting up reception centers in Vietnam where abandoned children could be taken while homes are found for them in the United States.

The council is also helping to form The Committee of 1,000 a group of individuals each contributing $100 to adoption efforts in Vietnam.  

Senator Harrison A. Williams, Jr. who has sponsored a bill on Vietnamese child welfare, has worked with the New Jersey group as have Jim Bouton, the former baseball player and television sports commentator, and Jerry Orbach, the actor."

Filed under  //   Committee of 1000   Memory Loss   Parkinsons   Roy Bertelsen   StoryCorps  

Comments [3]

The Hierarchy Of Digital Distractions

This wonderful distraction pyramid is making the rounds -- and showing how all the wonderful digital platforms that seek to connect us are actually separating us from producing "real" work.  

But then again, before twitter, email, skype, etc. I had lots of face-to-face meetings -- and real work didn't get done then either.

Filed under  //   digital distractions   real work  

Comments [0]

HuffPo publishes my op-ed

I've always wanted to write an op-ed piece but somehow I never got around to it.  And, then, a chance tweet introduced me to the Op-Ed Project.  I attended their seminar this summer in NYC and thought, why not?  If nothing else, it'll force me to write -- even if it doesn't get published.  To my delight, last Saturday, the Huffington Post picked up and published my op-ed on health care which I originally posted here on September 16th.  To all those who have an idea to change the world, write it and send it out.  You never know, who'll pick up.  

Comments [0]

Autumnal Equinox

Last night, we officially entered Autumn but the garden began it's ascent two weeks ago. That's why today's harvest is paltry compared to last month but still ample for a gazpacho or maybe a riff on Trestle on Tenth's lovely chilled tomato soup with grilled shrimp and cucumber.

Anne Mai Bertelsen

Sent from my wireless

Comments [0]

Why the Insured Should Support Health Care Reform: Employer Sponsored Health Insurance is an Endangered Species.

South Carolina Republican Congressman Joe Wilson’s decidedly un-Congressional outburst during President Obama’s speech on health care reform was met with swift censure from his colleagues on both sides of the political fence.  But while he was publicly called out for his inappropriate and disrespectful behavior toward the President, no one has taken him on for the slanderous allegations that he and other anti-health reformers have propagated for months: allegations that characterize the uninsured as illegal aliens, scofflaws, uneducated and poor. Allegations that have successfully convinced the insured that health care reform is detrimental to their health.  Yet, these charges distort the facts and divert attention from a troubling trend: employer-sponsored insurance is an endangered species and without health care reform, including a public option, many more Americans will join the ranks of the uninsured.  Including, potentially, my family.

Of course, we are not illegal immigrants, scofflaws, uneducated or poor.  We look like the majority of the uninsured, according to US Census Bureau and the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. We are American citizens like 85 per cent of the non-insured. One of us has a year-round, full time job, as do 67 per cent of the non-insured. We are college-educated, as are 31 per cent of the non-insured. We are white or ”other” as are 30 percent of the non-insured.

What happened to us is what has happened to many of the 14.5 million who are unemployed: we lost our employer-sponsored health insurance when my husband was laid off last year. We did not have the luxury of turning to my employer. Like 17 million other Americans, I am self-employed, a sole proprietor whose health insurance was covered by a spouse’s employer.

With signs that the economy is slowly rebounding, many families hope finding a job will restore their health insurance. After all, more than half of all Americans receive health insurance through their employers. But full time employment is no guarantee of health insurance coverage.

The number of private employers offering health insurance has declined steadily this decade. Back in 2000, more than 69 per cent offered their employees health insurance, according to research from the Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Education Trust. By last year, that number dropped to 63 per cent. 

The biggest decline came from small businesses, particularly those with fewer than 26 employees.  Only 49 per cent of these small businesses offer coverage – down from 57 per cent in 2000.  The National Small Business Association corroborates these findings: they found that only 38 percent of their members offer coverage; 14 years ago, 67 percent offered their employees coverage.

The decline in health care coverage by small business employers is particularly troubling since this sector accounted for 94 per cent of all new jobs created in the U.S. in the last two decades. More than 70 million Americans work for a small business today.  But small businesses have been crippled by the ever-escalating costs of health insurance and many have been forced to forgo this luxury benefit.

If left unaddressed, this trend of businesses dropping health insurance coverage could add another eight million Americans to the ranks of the uninsured in ten years, bringing the total to 54 million Americans without health insurance, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office.

So far our family has not lost its insurance. Unlike others who lost theirs due to unemployment, we were fortunate enough to not only have access to COBRA – a continuation of our health insurance for 18 months – but, also the financial well being to pay the $1500 monthly premiums. Others have not been so fortunate. Some had no access to COBRA when their companies closed up; others had to make the difficult trade off between food and shelter or health insurance because their unemployment payments couldn’t cover both. 

COBRA ends this month and, with it, our options. While we will save some money, we will pay higher out-of-pocket costs, see a reduction in level of coverage and greater restrictions placed on which doctors, hospitals and procedures we can use.  But, at some point, if my husband continues to be unemployed and my business continues with its revenue halved, $1200-a-month health insurance may be an unaffordable luxury for us too.  And then we will officially join the ranks of the un-insured.  Not as illegal immigrants, scofflaws or the uneducated.  But as the working poor, our savings depleted by health insurance premiums.

 

Filed under  //   healthcare reform  

Comments [0]